Woodland, CA Deserves Better Than Flock

Across California, Flock Safety has repeatedly violated data protection laws and proven disingenuous to communities

Immigration Enforcement Searches
Since 2022
Direct Federal Access
2023-2024
Out of State Searches Since 2022

The Problem in 3 Points

Flock Safety Violates California Law

Mountain View, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Richmond—multiple California cities have discovered Flock enabled federal agencies to access local data in direct violation of Senate Bill 34 (2015). Woodland’s contract was just extended. Has our data been illegally accessed too?

Security Vulnerabilities Expose Your Data

Senator Ron Wyden’s (Oregon) investigation found Flock doesn’t require multi-factor authentication. At least 35 customer account passwords were stolen by hackers. At one point, Flock cameras and admin dashboards could be accessed publicly. Your location data, every trip to work, church, the doctor, school, could be freely accessed due to Flock failing to meet the most basic data security measures.

Other Cities Are Saying “No More”

Los Altos Hills, Oakland, Mountain View, Woodburn, Olympia, Mountlake Terrace, Skamania County—cities across California and the Pacific Northwest are canceling Flock contracts. Woodland can join them.

“I personally no longer have confidence in this particular vendor.”

– Mike Canfield, Mountain View Police Chief
Feb 2026 after suspending Flock

Why This Matters

Woodland recently approved to extend its contract with Flock Safety, a surveillance company that operates automated license plate reader (ALPR) cameras throughout our city. These cameras photograph every vehicle that passes, logging license plates, vehicle characteristics, and location data into a massive, searchable database — accessible to hundreds of agencies across California with little transparency or accountability to Woodland residents, including over 2 million out-of-state searches and 14,000+ Federal searches.

Known Flock Cameras in Woodland

Flock Safety has proven, repeatedly, that they cannot be trusted to follow California law.

And Woodland deserves better.

Frequently Asked Questions

Our campaign is focused on transparency, legal compliance, and accountability over surveillance of Woodland residents’ movements. The documented problems here are with Flock Safety’s system architecture and track record, and holding Woodland PD accountable with transparency to their community.

The question isn’t whether surveillance technology exists, it’s whether Woodland residents have any meaningful say in how their movements are tracked, who accesses that data, how that data is used, and whether California law is being followed. Those are questions every resident deserves answered.

Whatever tools Woodland uses to investigate crimes must comply with California law and include genuine public accountability. The current contract has failed on both counts, along with Woodland PD failing to follow their own policies regarding ALPR usage.

No. Multiple California cities have documented illegal federal access to their Flock data: Mountain View, San Francisco, Santa Cruz, Richmond. This isn’t theoretical, it’s happening. Senator Ron Wyden’s federal investigation confirmed security vulnerabilities. These are documented facts, not speculation.

Contracts entered through improper process or that violate state law can be voided. And the cost of legal liability if Woodland continues using a non-compliant system could be far higher. Several cities have successfully exited Flock contracts.

When federal immigration agencies like ICE and CBP can access location data showing where people live, work, worship, and send their kids to school, that directly undermines California’s sanctuary state protections. California law prohibits this—but Flock enabled it anyway in multiple cities.

Woodland City Council needs to hear from residents and be fully aware about Flock